What I read on October 7th

Anyone who looks at my silhouette will know that I’m enjoying a good meal or two. I’m a foodie who saw Julia Child on PBS in the 70’s.

“What people don’t quite understand, your 10 meals a week, you’re probably lucky enough to get a star restaurant a week or a star contender, and the other meals are pretty mediocre. And that’s kind of a drudgery. And you get into uncomfortable situations if at the end of your region you have an additional restaurant that you have not taken into account. So have dinner at 6 p.m. and another dinner at 8 p.m. So lunch, dinner and dinner. I’ve done it a couple of times. You know you are careful, you eat half the dessert, you eat sensibly. I’m not talking about eating at Michelin star restaurants twice in a row, these are usually pretty ordinary restaurants. “

Ah, the trials and tribulations of being a Michelin Guide inspector. Here’s the inside report, Confessions of a Michelin Inspector. From Luxeat via the browser.

As a doctor, I am old enough to remember a time before CT scans. To identify a mass, radiologists then used a technique developed in the 1940s called tomography, which involved taking multiple x-rays that moved the radiation source and film at the same time, changing the depth of field so you could see different slices. Computer controlled tomography replaces this older technology.

“While on a forced leave to think about his future and what he could do for the company, Hounsfield met a doctor who complained about the poor quality of brain x-rays. Simple x-rays show wonderful details of bones, but the brain is an amorphous lump of tissue – everything looks like fog on an x-ray. This got Hounsfield thinking about his old idea of ​​finding hidden structures without opening the box. “

From The Conversation 50 years ago, the first CT scan allowed doctors to see inside a living skull, thanks to an eccentric engineer from the Beatles’ record company

“There’s this ‘biodiversity hypothesis’ that people without different environmental microbiota are more likely to develop immune-mediated diseases,” says Aki Sinkkonen, evolutionary ecologist at the Natural Resources Institute Finland. “But nobody had really tested that with children before.”

The biodiversity hypothesis is a new form of the hygiene hypothesis that suggests that our increasingly hygienic, less biodiversified environment is affecting our immune response. Wired draws our attention to an interesting study: What forest floor playgrounds teach us about children and germs

Science and politics have always been intertwined and intertwined. The volume has increased significantly due to our more networked world.

When done correctly, the cover of science trains an author to clarify complexity, accept nuances, understand that everything new is built on old foundations, and explore the unknown while delineating the boundaries of his own ignorance. The best science writers learn that science is not a string of facts and breakthroughs, but an erratic stumble towards gradually diminishing uncertainty; that peer-reviewed publications are not gospel and that even reputable magazines are polluted with nonsense; and that scientific endeavors are plagued by human errors such as hubris. “

That goes for a good doctor, so I feel doubly blessed, or at least educated. What counts as science writing from the Atlantic?

Source link

About Vincent Hand

Check Also

North Korea is diverting nuclear power in the midst of the regional arms race and wants the US to end “hostile policies”

Nick Schifrin: But North Korea says it will not meet with the US while the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *